Witness impeachment

Results: 260



#Item
191Evidence / Perjury / Witness / Criminal Procedure / Party / Perjury in Nigeria / Witness impeachment / Law / Legal terms / Evidence law

Section 33: Section 33 deals with ‘Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, the truth of facts therein stated: It reads as follows:

Add to Reading List

Source URL: lawcommissionofindia.nic.in

Language: English - Date: 2003-11-11 00:17:26
192Federal Rules of Evidence / United States federal law / Evidence / United States Constitution / Rules of evidence / Jury / Witness impeachment / Impeachment investigations of United States federal judges / Law / Evidence law / United States evidence law

Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules Minutes of the Meeting of April 17th, 2000 Chicago, Illinois. The Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence met on April 17th in Room 2544 of the Federal Courthouse in Chica

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.uscourts.gov

Language: English - Date: 2006-07-21 09:47:24
193Hearsay / Federal Rules of Evidence / United States federal law / Federal Rules of Civil Procedure / Evidence / Crawford v. Washington / Confrontation Clause / Rules of evidence / Witness impeachment / Law / Evidence law / United States evidence law

Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules Minutes of the Meeting of November 16, 2007 Washington, D.C. The Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence (the “Committee”) met on November 16, 2007 in Washington, D.C.

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.uscourts.gov

Language: English - Date: 2008-05-06 16:10:44
194Hearsay / Tome v. United States / Federal Rules of Evidence / Evidence / Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements / Admission / Hearsay in United States law / Witness impeachment / Law / Evidence law / United States evidence law

Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules Minutes of the Meeting of May 3, 2013 Miami, Florida The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence (the “Committee”) met on May 3, 2013, at the Unive

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.uscourts.gov

Language: English - Date: 2014-07-10 11:39:29
195Testimony / Evidence / Hearsay / Witness / Relevance / Witness impeachment / Evidence law / Law / Character evidence

COMMON OBJECTIONS TO THE STATE’S EVIDENCE IN DISTRICT COURT  Objection  Not relevant  Law   Rule 401 

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.ncids.org

Language: English - Date: 2009-09-23 15:40:25
196Character evidence / Federal Rules of Civil Procedure / Witness impeachment / Evidence / Relevance / Motion / Hearsay in United States law / Hearsay in English law / Law / Evidence law / Federal Rules of Evidence

Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules Minutes of the Meeting of May 1-2, 2008 Boston, MA The Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence (the “Committee”) met on May 1 and 2nd 2008 in Boston. st

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.uscourts.gov

Language: English - Date: 2008-10-28 11:36:58
197Federal Rules of Evidence / United States federal law / Evidence law / Evidence / Defamation / Witness impeachment / Public policy doctrines for the exclusion of relevant evidence / Law / United States evidence law / Juries

C:umentumwedK22360134371471Minutes April 2005.wpd

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.uscourts.gov

Language: English - Date: 2006-07-21 09:59:56
198Government / Juries / Evidence / Witness / Opening statement / Batson v. Kentucky / Legal terms / Witness impeachment / Wisconsin Circuit Court / Law / Legal procedure / Evidence law

OUJI-CR 1-4 FAIR AND IMPARTIAL JURY Both the State of Oklahoma and the defendant(s) are entitled to jurors who approach this case with open minds and agree to keep their minds open until a verdict is reached. Jurors must

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.okcca.net

Language: English - Date: 2013-08-16 10:59:13
199Witness impeachment / Acquittal / Perjury / Continuance / Brady material / Appeal / Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution / Jencks Act / Law / Legal terms / Kyles v. Whitley

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.jud.ct.gov

Language: English - Date: 2001-06-12 11:19:40
200Methamphetamine / Evidence / Idaho / Harmless error / Medicine / Neurochemistry / Witness impeachment / Law / Anorectics / Euphoriants

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DANIEL WALTER BERGERUD, Defendant-Appellant.

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.isc.idaho.gov

Language: English - Date: 2013-10-22 14:27:07
UPDATE